Skip to main content
· 9/14/2023

In the Matter of: Brenda Alexandria McClaney Wise

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing for want of substantial federal question appeal from Delaware decision placing burden of proving insanity on defendant
  • dismissing for want of a substantial federal question a constitutional challenge to a Delaware Supreme Court decision sustaining a statutory apportionment of the burden of proof as to insanity similar to that mandated by Novosel
  • appeal claiming that the Winship and Mullaney decisions had overruled Leland dismissed as not presenting a substantial federal question
  • appeal claiming that the Winship and Mullaney decisions had overruled Leland dismissed as not presenting a substantial federal question
  • statute placing proof of insanity by a preponderance with defendants affirmed on authority of Leland by state court; appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question
  • statute placing proof of insanity by a preponderance with defendants affirmed on authority of Leland by state court; appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.