· 9/14/2023
In the Matter of: Brenda Alexandria McClaney Wise
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing for want of substantial federal question appeal from Delaware decision placing burden of proving insanity on defendant
- dismissing for want of a substantial federal question a constitutional challenge to a Delaware Supreme Court decision sustaining a statutory apportionment of the burden of proof as to insanity similar to that mandated by Novosel
- appeal claiming that the Winship and Mullaney decisions had overruled Leland dismissed as not presenting a substantial federal question
- appeal claiming that the Winship and Mullaney decisions had overruled Leland dismissed as not presenting a substantial federal question
- statute placing proof of insanity by a preponderance with defendants affirmed on authority of Leland by state court; appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question
- statute placing proof of insanity by a preponderance with defendants affirmed on authority of Leland by state court; appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.