In the Matter of: Barry Elliott Gosin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that issues, “which are unavoidably fact-sensitive, should be addressed first by the dis- trict court”
• stating that “[b]ecause [the] text is clear, we needn’t consult extra-textual evidence concerning ‘history’ and ‘purpose’”
• noting that two private individuals were permitted to intervene as defendants under Rule 24 where liver-transplant candidates and hospitals challenged HHS policy
• “We are, after all, a court of re- view, not a court of first view.”
• “We are wary of diving head-first into claims that the district court hasn’t yet considered . . . .”
• “We are, after all, a court of re- view, not a court of first view.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).