Skip to main content
· 1/10/1989

In the Matter of Anne Pilsbury

Citations

  • 866 F.2d 22
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 406
  • 1989 WL 1114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[l]eave need not be granted where the 28 amendment of the complaint . . . constitutes an exercise in futility”
  • “agreement or meeting of minds to violate . . . constitutional rights 2 must be shown.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Pratt, Mahoney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.