In the Matter of: Andrea Bethany Korb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Spinkellink's language precluding federal courts from reviewing state court application of capital sentencing criteria no longer valid
• concluding that Spinkellink’s language precluding federal courts from reviewing state court application of capital sentencing criteria no longer valid
• holding that \[t]he circumstances of this case ... do not satisfy the criteria [for torture] laid out by the Georgia Supreme Court itself\ in its cases construing the aggravating circumstance
• holding that “[t]he circumstances of this case ... do not satisfy the criteria [for torture] laid out by the Georgia Supreme Court itself” in its cases construing the aggravating circumstance
• holding that Georgia’s “outrageously or wantonly vile, horrible or inhuman” aggravating circumstance was unconstitutionally vague
• holding that “outrageously or wantonly vile, horrible and inhuman” was too vague of a sentencing factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).