In the Marriage of Shirbroun

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming lower court’s determination that parties’ email exchange resulted in a binding settlement agreement where “the e-mail exchange included all material terms, a deadline for acceptance, and acceptance without equivocation”
• \[E]-mail exchanges between the parties formed a clear and complete agreement . . . [under which t]he material terms were set and agreed upon\
• “[E]-mail exchanges between the parties formed a clear and complete agreement . . . [under which t]he material terms were set and agreed upon”
• if a clause in a contract is ambiguous, jury “properly called upon to resolve the intent of the parties”
• upholding allowance of postverdict “motion to enforce the settlement agreement”
• contract provision governing work “started” before year end was ambiguous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).