In the Interest of: Z.T.-D.N., of: C.B.N.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a court’s review of a guardianship proceeding must be “singularly mindful of the trial court’s unique opportunity and responsibility to assess the circumstances presented”
• stating that “lawyers who violate the conflict of interest rules must be disqualified because there is an irrebuttable presumption that a lawyer obtains a client’s confidential information during representation[]”
• applying irrebuttable presumption in context of motion to disqualify pursuant to Rules 1.02, 1.06, and 1.09
• “Neither conclusory statements of similarities nor facial similarities will suffice— the movant must delineate specific facts that tie the former and current representations together.”
• “A guardian can provide essential care for the ward. But tragically, wards are also vulnerable to neglect, abuse, and exploitation.”
• client revealed confidences told to her attorney in the form of her will, which was a public document

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).