In the Interest of Z.D.R.R. and Z.U.C., Children v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “no reasonable person would say” that defendant’s “two sales of cocaine, thirty days apart, occurred on the same occasion”
• explaining that “a state conviction cannot be an ACCA predicate if the statute of conviction proscribes a broader range of conduct than what Section 924(e)(2)(A)(ii) defines as a ‘serious drug offense’”
• reading “distributing” in ACCA in pari materia with “distribute” in the Controlled Sub- stances Act
• “No reasonable person would say that [the defendant’s] two sales of cocaine, thirty days apart, occurred on the same occa- sion.”
• “No reasonable person would say that [the defendant’s] two sales of cocaine, thirty days apart, occurred on the same occasion”
• “No reasonable person would say that Penn’s two sales of cocaine, thirty days apart, occurred on the same occa- sion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).