In the Interest of: X.R., of: W.R., Father

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that allowing religious school groups to use school facilities does not violate the Establishment Clause
• holding that allowing religious school groups to use school facilities does not violate the Establishment Clause
• holding that Establishment Clause did not require public school to bar evangelical Christian student group from using facilities accessed by various other groups
• holding that denying access to school facilities to Bible club that sought to teach \morals and character\ from an evangelical religious perspective was viewpoint discrimination
• concluding that the denial of a religious club’s access to a limited public forum constituted impermissible viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment
• concluding that the denial of a religious club’s access to a limited public forum constituted impermissible viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).