In the Interest of X.R. and X.A., Children v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was a genuine issue of material fact about the availability of administrative remedies before addressing the propriety of the district court acting as a factfinder to resolve the issue
• holding that prisoners must “properly take each step within the administrative process” to exhaust administrative remedies in accordance with the PLRA
• holding that, to exhaust administrative remedies in accordance with the PLRA, prisoners must “properly take each step within the administrative process”
• holding that to exhaust administrative remedies in accordance with the PLRA, prisoners must “properly take each step within the administrative process.”
• holding that prisoners must “properly take each step within the administrative process” to exhaust administrative remedies in accordance with the PLRA
• holding that prisoners must “properly take each step within the administrative process” to exhaust administrative remedies in accordance with the PLRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).