Skip to main content
· 5/2/2017

in the Interest of T.T.B., a Child

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s use of plaintiff’s trademarks in advertising and brochures was sufficient to establish liability for trademark infringement
  • reversing district court because the definition of “use in commerce” in § 1127 “does not apply to trademark infringement”
  • existence of other non-patent claims “immaterial” to Federal Circuit jurisdiction
  • existence of other non-patent claims “immaterial” to Federal Circuit jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.