In the Interest of T.P., A.P., K.S., and K.S., Children v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that homeowner-borrower was third-party beneficiary of force-placed insurance policy when policy contained provision that was for “sole benefit” of borrower
• “Whether the contract was made for her benefit is derived solely from the language of the contract.”
• “[The subrogation clause] is written for the sole benefit of the borrower.... We also find that the insurance contract was actually made, in part, for the benefit of Palma [the borrower].”
• subrogation clause case decided under Texas law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).