Skip to main content
· 7/22/2004

in the Interest of T.N. and M.N., Children

Citations

  • 142 S.W.3d 522
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 6710

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that father lacked standing to complain about his children’s counsel’s allegedly deficient performance
  • explaining that exception of “doctrine of virtual representation” that allows party to complain about error that affects rights of other person requires “identical interests”
  • an appealing party cannot complain of errors that do not injuriously affect that party or that merely affect others

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dauphinot, Holman, Gardner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.