In the Interest of T.M., M.M. and D.M., Minor Children

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that claim trial court focused solely on serious nature of offense, without considering protection of public or rehabilitative needs of defendant, presents substantial question
• affirming conviction of physical abuse of a dog, dismissing discretionary aspects of sentencing claim, but remanding for imposition of mandatory fine required by Section 5511(a)(1)(i)
• allegation that trial court focused solely on the nature of the offense presented a substantial question
• claim that trial court failed to consider all factors as required by Section 9721(b) raised a substantial question
• allegation that trial court focused solely on nature of offense presented substantial question
• “[A] claim that the trial -9- J-S10011-23 court focused solely on the nature of the offense, without considering the protection of the public or the rehabilitative needs of the appellant … presents a substantial question.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).