In the Interest of T.E.S. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that whether there was a mutual mistake is a question of fact
• relying on Scutieri and noting that parties “may be ‘charged’ with constructive notice” of public court document, though they lacked actual notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).