in the Interest of T. W. M., III, a Child

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that defendants often have superior information about their age, and thus a preponderance standard is appropriate
• noting that defendants often have superior information about their age and birthdates, and thus a preponderance standard is appropriate
• “We have long recognized that, in the civil context, an order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is immediately appealable as of right.”
• “[B]ecause the criminal defendant and the State have an equal interest in trying the defendant in the proper court, preponderance of the evidence is the proper standard of proof .... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).