In the Interest of S.S., R.S., and S.S., Minor Children

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that overall regulatory structure within which streamlining procedures fit mitigates the risk of erroneous deprivation of applicant’s substantial interest
• holding that BIA’s failure to issue opinion does not compromise due process where court of appeals can “review the IJ’s decision directly”
• holding that Alba- thani’s “careful reasoning is persuasive and, like the other courts of appeal that followed, we embrace its rationale”
• holding that it is not “a due process violation for the [Board] to affirm the IJ’s decision without issuing an opinion”
• concluding that the BIA did not violate petitioners’ due process rights by streamlining their appeal
• concluding that the BIA did not violate petitioners’ due process rights by streamlining their appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).