In the Interest of S.H., L.H., A.H., and P.H., Minor Children

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court impermissibly closed voir dire to family members because it failed to consider all reasonable alternatives to that closure
• holding that these standards apply before excluding the public from any stage of a criminal trial
• recognizing that “trial courts are required to consider alternatives to elosure[,] even when they are not offered by the parties”
• recognizing that safety concerns and threats could certainly be concrete enough reasons to warrant closing a trial
• recognizing that safety concerns and threats could certainly be concrete enough reasons to warrant closing a trial
• holding that no part of the trial process is exempt from the public trial guarantee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).