Skip to main content
· 12/23/2015

in the Interest of S.C., a Child

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a defendant’s use of BitTorrent for child pornography circumstantially established that he was aware he was providing child pornography for others, given that the program specifically provided for sharing of material between users
  • explaining that \findings based on inferences drawn from discerned facts\ are reviewed only for clear error
  • highlighting how clear error's \heights are difficult to scale\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.