in the Interest of R.J.P. and A.R.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing with North Glenn and holding that “appraisers may decide the factual cause of damage to property in determining the amount of loss from a storm”
• agreeing with North Glenn and holding that “appraisers may decide the factual cause of damage to property in determining the amount of loss from a storm”
• “Coverage questions are for the court. . . . But we conclude factual causation issues may be decided through the appraisal process.”
• “appraisers necessarily address causation when determining the amount of the loss from an insured event”
• “[A]ppraisers must consider what damage was caused by hail, and what damage was not, or damage with which they are unconcerned, such as normal wear and tear.”
• insurer could raise policy exclusion in court following appraisal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).