In the Interest of R. E. W.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that trial court erred in restricting father’s visitation based on his alleged “immoral conduct,” where there was no evidence of any harm to the child
• father's homosexuality did not merit restrictive visitation absent evidence that child was exposed to father's conduct in a manner that is harmful
• father’s homosexuality did not merit restrictive visitation absent evidence that child was exposed to father’s conduct in a manner that is harmful
• abuse of discretion to refuse father unsupervised visitation with child based on father’s purported “immoral conduct” without evidence the child was or would be exposed to undesirable conduct and had or would be adversely affected thereby
• abuse of discretion to refuse father unsupervised visitation with child based on father's purported \immoral conduct\ without evidence the child was or would be exposed to undesirable conduct and had or would be adversely affected thereby

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).