In the Interest of Q. F.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a three-hour interview was noncustodial
• no prejudicial error where questionable remarks of prosecutor provoked or made in response to previous arguments or statements of defense counsel
• nontestimonial evidence is examined in light of state hearsay statutes
• nontestimonial evidence is examined in light of state hearsay statutes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).