In the Interest of P.W., Minor Child

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding infringement not willful where defendant testified that he believed he was entitled to use the marks
• upholding the denial of attorney’s fees despite aggressive litigation tactics and discovery abuses
• enjoining defendants from using plaintiff’s trademarks as hashtags in 14 advertising
• “‘[A] court may award a defendant’s profits solely upon a finding that the defendant fraudulently used the plaintiff's mark.’”
• “An ‘affirmative defense’ is ‘[a] defendant’s assertion of facts and arguments that, if true, will defeat the plaintiff’s or prosecution’s claim, even if all the allegations in the complaint are true.’” (quoting Defense, Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019)
• “An ‘affirmative defense’ is ‘[a] defendant’s assertion of facts and 14 arguments that, if true, will defeat the plaintiff’s . . . claim, even if all the allegations in the 15 complaint are true.’” (quoting Defense, Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).