In the Interest of P.A., Minor Child

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statute waiving PATH’S immunity in New York and New Jersey courts did not waive immunity from suit in federal court
• concluding that specific provisions in New York and New Jersey statutes evinced that both states had expressly consented to suit
• holding that State's waiver could be limited by state statute to suits \laid within a county or judicial district\ that is \situated wholly or partially within the Port of New York District\
• holding that the Port Authority is not a state agency for Eleventh Amendment purposes
• holding that the Eleventh Amendment provides immunity to states in suits for monetary relief
• holding that a venue provision allowing for venue to “be laid within a county or judicial district, established by one of said States or by the United States” constituted a waiver of Eleventh Amendment immunity in an associated consent-to-suit provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).