in the Interest of O.D. and A.D.-A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that we did not need to decide whether testimony by the defendant’s former wife was improperly admitted because the defendant failed to establish that the alleged error significantly affected the verdict
• explaining that we give no deference to the factfinder’s choice between reasonable inferences
• noting an appellate court has discretion to review an unobjected-to instruction if it constitutes plain error affecting substantial rights
• declining to address the defendant's arguments regarding the trial court's admission of testimony about abuse that took place in Liberia because the alleged errors were harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).