In the Interest of N. W.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[p]lain error review generally is not applicable” to an “affirmative waiver of [an] issue”
• A “meeting of the minds” may be shown “by circumstantial evidence from which an inference of common design may be drawn.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).