Skip to main content
· 11/23/2015

In the Interest of N. T., a Child

Citations

  • 334 Ga. App. 732
  • 780 S.E.2d 416

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • question is whether there is clear and convincing evidence that specified causes of dependency are likely to continue
  • speculation that child might be upset and begin acting out if he learned of possibility of being removed from foster care was not evidence that parent’s present relationship with child was harmful
  • speculation that child might be upset and begin acting out if he learned of possibility of being removed from foster care was not evidence that parent’s present relationship with child was harmful

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Doyle, Phipps

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.