Skip to main content
· 3/10/2003

In the Interest of N. Q.

Citations

  • 260 Ga. App. 118
  • 578 S.E.2d 920

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a juvenile court abuses its discretion if its ruling “‘does not logically follow from the findings upon which it supposedly rests or has no reasonable relationship to its announced objective.’”
  • acknowledging that there is an “interesting interplay between the parent’s right to parent and the child’s best interests[,]” and explaining that “[i]n balancing fairness to the parent and fulfilling the needs of the child, the child prevails”
  • “A critical factor in determining what is in the best interest of a child is the desire for permanence in the child’s life,”
  • court can terminate parental rights while permanency plan is on appeal because statute authorizes court to rule on TPR petition within 180 days of its filing
  • “[T]he focus of the inquiry [in contested adoption and TPR cases] into the child’s best interest—even with the parental presumption in place—must be on the child, not the parent.”
  • ”[T]he focus of the inquiry [in contested adoption and TPR cases] into the child’s best interest—even with the parental presumption in place—must be on the child, not the parent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.