In THE INTEREST OF N. O., CHILDREN (FATHER)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[N]o federal court to our knowledge has ever granted a writ where a state court’s asserted lack of jurisdiction resulted solely from the provisions of state law.”
• “[N]o 14 federal court to our knowledge has ever granted a writ where a state court’s 15 asserted lack of jurisdiction resulted solely from the provisions of state law.”
• “‘[N]o federal court to our knowledge has ever granted a writ where a state court’s asserted lack of jurisdiction resulted solely from the provisions of state law.’” (quoting United States v. Mancusi, 415 F.2d 205, 209 (2d Cir. 1969))
• “Although New York has chosen to style § 20.40 of its Criminal Procedure Law in terms of jurisdiction, the statute is in fact concerned with venue. . . . A violation of its laws allocating jurisdiction among its various counties does not create a federal constitutional issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).