in the Interest of M.M.-Y.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion to reopen where he failed to present evidence that materially affected his likelihood of facing torture
• explaining that “fear of generalized violence is insufficient to establish that [the petitioner] in particular is more likely than not to be tortured”
• explaining that “fear of generalized violence is insufficient to establish that [the petitioner] in particular is more likely than not to be tortured”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).