in the Interest of M.M., a Child

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that states have traditionally occupied the field of consumer protection
• holding that states have traditionally occupied the field of consumer protection
• holding that states have traditionally occupied the field of consumer protection
• holding that states have traditionally occupied the field of consumer protection
• noting that 21 C.F.R. § 101.9(c)(7) “allow[s] nitrogen to be used on the [NFP] as a proxy for protein content”
• reversing dismissal of state-law claim that seller’s label made false claim about source of protein in supplement where federal stand- ards were silent about source of protein

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).