In the Interest of M.I., Pet of: K. Keenan, Esq.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the criminal offense of conspiracy to willfully evade federal taxes “obviously cannot be committed in the absence of knowledge of willfulness”
• \[T]he life of the conspiracy cannot be extended by evidence of concealment after the conspiracy's criminal objectives have been fully accomplished.\
• “[T]he life of the conspiracy cannot be extended by evidence of concealment after the conspiracy’s criminal objectives have been fully accomplished.”
• “A conspiracy may have multiple purposes any one of which, if a violation of federal law, may constitute the basis for” a conspiracy conviction
• conspiratorial intent cannot exist without knowledge; evidence of knowledge must be clear and unequivocal
• Defendants were not liable for the wagering tax and could not, therefore, have been convicted of the crime which they were charged with having conspired to commit; hence, conspiracy conviction reversed.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).