Skip to main content
· 8/16/2019

in the Interest of M.E.S. and R.T.S., Minor Children

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “time-barred acts [are allowed] as support for a timely claim”
  • noting that the notice pleading standard under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 does not require plaintiffs to identify all possible comparators
  • noting that the Ledbetter Act “legislatively reversed the Supreme Court’s decision eschewing the paycheck accrual rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.