in the Interest of M.C v. and M.D v.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \We need not linger over [appellant's] contentions because he waived this claim by failing to request such an instruction below.\
• an appellant told inves- tigators about his typical prescription habits in an anti-kickback case, but investiga- tors were able to prove his habits were not as claimed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).