In the Interest Of: M. S., a Child (Father)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant had “offered nothing but rank speculation as to the nature of the allegedly suppressed materials, which cannot establish a Brady violation”
• holding that the \nexus\ requirement applies to Section 1512(c)(2)
• requiring that “the defendant contemplate[] a particular, foreseeable proceeding”
• requiring a nexus to a proceeding that was “either pending or was reasonably foreseeable”
• requiring a defendant to have suffered prejudice to establish a Giglio claim
• affirming admission of Nazi memorabilia to show “predisposition to support terrorist activity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).