In the Interest of L.T., Minor Child, T.B., Mother

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “mere possibility of prejudice is not sufficient to support the position that . . . speedy trial rights were violated” (quotation simplified)
• deeming the third Barker factor neutral where the defendant had no knowledge of his indictment during a delay of twenty-two months
• discussing unavailability of business records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).