In the Interest of: L.L. & L.L., Juveniles Juvenile Officer v. D.L.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[s]ince Lexmark and Susan B. Anthony, we have not directly addressed whether the prudential ripeness doctrine remains good law” and only assumed that it is
• “We ordinarily deem an argument to be forfeited where it has not been sufficiently argued in the briefs, such as when it is only addressed in a footnote.” (citations and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).