in the Interest of L.E., a Child

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concerning a section 221(g) refusal for an applicant who lied about her age, offered a fake passport, and never provided the requested documents to confirm her age
• doctrine applied to final visa determination based on Section 221(g) refusal not requiring administrative processing
• “The Su- preme Court has unambiguously instructed that absent some clear directive from Congress or an affirmative showing of bad faith, the government must simply provide a valid ineligibility provision as the basis for the visa denial.”
• “The Supreme Court recognized a narrow exception to this general rule in Mandel, allowing for limited judicial review when a U.S. citizen's own constitutional rights … are assertedly burdened by a visa denial.”
• not discussing issue and affirming district court that did not decide the issue
• “The Supreme Court has unambiguously instructed that absent some clear directive from Congress or an affirmative showing of bad faith, the government must simply provide a valid ineligibility provision as the basis for a visa denial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).