In the Interest of: K.R. v. D.D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that evidence showed noncompliance with regulations and concluding “failure to comply with the regulations amounts to an unfair or deceptive act or practice” as defined by regulation
• appellees entitled to award of fees reflecting time spent successfully defending judgment on claim under G. L. c. 93A

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).