In the Interest of K.R. and G.R., Children v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an employer and credit union were not a single employer for purposes of Title VII because there existed no central control of labor relations
• concluding an 23 entity exercised no control over another entity’s personnel decisions
• finding summary judgment was warranted when the plaintiff 20 presented no evidence disputing Safeway had no control over SAFCU’s personnel decisions
• declining to supplement the record in the absence of an explanation of why the new evidence could not have been presented earlier

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).