In the Interest of J.S., P.S., and S.S., Minor Children

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• commenting upon the “persuasiveness of [DNA] evidence in the eyes of the jury”
• “[T]he [Ninth Circuit] Court of Appeals’ discussion of the ... evidence departed from the deferential review that ... § 2254(d)(1) demand[s].”
• equating reversal for insufficient evidence with a judgment of acquittal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).