In the Interest of J.S., A.B., H.O., and C.O., Children v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a plaintiff alleging discrimination on the basis of disability may show that “after rejection or termination the position remained open, or the disabled individual was replaced”
• concluding that a plaintiff alleging discrimination on the basis of disability may show that “after rejection or termination the position remained open, or the disabled individual was replaced”
• holding that, to establish a prima facie case of disability discrimination under Ohio law, the plaintiff must show: (1) that she was handicapped; (2
• holding that employer's explanation for replacing plaintiff established that employer relied on plaintiff's disabled status when making its decision
• holding that the plaintiff’s burden in an ADA case is to prove that the employer’s explanation is a pretext for unlawful discrimination
• concluding that a plaintiff alleging discrimination on the basis of disability may show that “after rejection or termination the position remained open, or the disabled individual was replaced”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).