In the Interest of J.S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a parent’s refusal to accept responsibility for prior abuse is relevant in evaluating the parent’s future ability to safely parent
• holding a parent’s incarceration makes it impossible to return a child to his or her care at the present time
• noting that a parent’s refusal to accept responsibility for prior abuse is relevant in evaluating the parent’s future ability to safely parent
• holding a parent does not have a constitutional, due-process right to be physically present at the termination hearing when he is incarcerated
• holding the presentation of testimony by deposition is sufficient to meet due process requirements
• holding the juvenile court afforded a parent due process if given notice of the proceedings, represented by counsel who is present at the proceedings, and afforded the opportunity to present testimony—by deposition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).