In the Interest of: J.F., of: J.F.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when an employer asserts that he cannot afford to pay a wage increase, the Union has a right to inspect his financial records
• holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith
• concluding that the duty to bargain in good faith may require a party to disclose information pertinent to the bargaining subject
• holding that when an employer asserts that he cannot afford to pay a wage increase, the Union has a right to inspect his financial records
• holding that the Act’s duty of good faith includes the disclosure of information relevant to the employer’s bargaining position
• noting that “[e]ach case must turn upon its particular facts” and that “[t]he inquiry must always be whether or not under the circumstances of the particular case the statutory obligation to bargain in good faith has been met”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).