in the Interest of J.E.H.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court could properly take judicial notice that it signed order adopting family service plan and of requirements listed in plan
• holding that trial court could properly take judicial notice that it signed order adopting family service plan and of requirements listed in plan
• holding trial court could properly take judicial notice that it signed an order adopting the family service plan and of the requirements of the plan
• holding trial court could not take judicial notice of allegations caseworker made in family service plan or in affidavit attached to the Department’s petition
• finding that, because the trial court could not take judicial notice of nonadjudicative facts, no evidence supported the trial court’s finding under ground (0) since nothing established that'the child was removed due to abuse or neglect
• noting that, because the trial court could not take judicial notice of the affidavit or the allegations made in the family service plan, neither the affidavit nor the allegations contained in the family service plan can support the judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).