In the Interest of J.D.B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the federal Indian Child Welfare Act, which has an identical active-efforts requirement, does not override “a state’s error preservation rules”
• finding mother’s failure to appeal from any of the CINA proceedings waived deficiencies in those proceedings
• finding mother’s failure to appeal from any of the CINA proceedings waived deficiencies in those proceedings
• “[N]othing in ICWA . . . expressly or impliedly preempts a state’s error preservation rules.”
• finding a parent could not challenge deficiencies in the CINA proceedings in a termination case when there had been no appeal of the CINA proceedings
• concluding the parent appealing the termination of their parental rights could not challenge the grounds for the CINA adjudication because the parent “did not appeal from any of the CINA proceedings and the time for appeal has passed. [The mother] cannot (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).