Skip to main content
· 2/18/1987

In the Interest of J.C.O. v. Anderson

Citations

  • 734 P.2d 458
  • 52 Utah Adv. Rep. 25
  • 1987 Utah LEXIS 654

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that any requirement to notify parents of deficiencies does not apply to children \physically endangered by abuse or neglect\; nothing said about separate focus on impact on parent-child relationship
  • affirming juvenile court’s termination of parental rights notwithstanding fact that adoption petition was pending in district court.
  • “Abandonment may be proven by either objective evidence of the parent’s conduct or by the expressed, subjective intent of the parent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham, Hall, Stewart, Howe, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.