In the Interest of J. O. L.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• uphold-ing State’s decision to nolle pros a simple robbery charge because the only rational inference, in light of evidence that defendant had employed a deadly weapon, was that defendant committed an armed robbery
• upholding State's decision to nolle pros a simple robbery charge because the only rational inference, in light of evidence that defendant had employed a deadly weapon, was that defendant committed an armed robbery
• “In considering whether an entry of nolle prosequi to a lesser included offense is unfair to the defendant, . . . the evidence must . . . be such that the jury could rationally convict only on the lesser included offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).