in the Interest of J. C. W. and I.O.W

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Davis “applies retroactively to cases on collateral review”
• holding that Davis applies retroactively to cases on collateral review
• noting that the court’s “recent holding in United States v. Keene, 955 F.3d 391 (4th Cir. 2020), suggests that we need not look through the VICAR elements and examine only the underlying state-law predicates”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).