In the Interest of I.M., S.G., K.G., and K.G., Minor Children

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant cannot claim that a stop was unconstitutionally prolonged by the State when any delay was a consequence of the defendant’s own conduct
• noting “neither Rodriguez nor Linze apply to dog sniffs that do not extend the duration of the stop”
• distinguishing Linze because the district court made no findings that any specific amount of time was added to the traffic stop in connection with the dog sniff
• “accepting the district court’s findings as true, we respectfully disagree with its legal conclusion that the deputy lacked reasonable suspicion to stop [Jennie] and question her regarding her presence in the storage facility”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).