in the Interest of I. D. G. v. A. G., E. R. G. and R. J. G., Children

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “when ‘plaintiffs bring a facial challenge to an agency [action] . . . the limitations period begins to run when the agency publishes the regulation’” (quoting Hire Order Ltd. v. Marianos, 698 F.3d 168, 170 (4th Cir. 2012)
• noting that the plaintiff bears the burden to demonstrate standing for each form of relief he seeks
• explaining that “past [harms can be] evidence[ of] a non-speculative threat of future injury”
• “Because standing implicates our Article III power to hear the case, we must resolve it first.”
• “[O]nly one plaintiff needs to have standing for a court to hear the case.” (citation omitted)
• “A plaintiff has the burden to ‘demonstrate standing for each claim he seeks to press’ and ‘for each form of relief’ sought.” (quoting Davis v. Fed. Election Comm’n, 554 U.S. 724, 734 (2008)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).